The sufficiency of contrastive interpretation in the novel "As If It Were a Canopy" by Moroccan Author Suad Al-Nasser, as a model

Authors

  • Sanae Harboul Ministry of Education | Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.G250525

Keywords:

Contrastive, Mohamed Bazzi, As If It Were a Shadow, Suad Al-Nasser, Interpretive Rhetoric, Contrast of Spaces, Contrast of Values

Abstract

This study aims to explore the topic of "Contrastive Interpretation in Contemporary Morocca Women's Novels," by adopting the approach of Dr. Mohamed Bazzi, which seeks to open up to mechanisms that contribute to the study of narrative discourse by linking it to life and values through a comprehensive approach based on modern rhetorical techniques, foremost among them contrast. This enables the reader, through numerous dualities, to delve into the narrative, probe the depths of the discourse, and connect it to human reality according to a new perspective. The study was applied to the novel "As If It Were a Shadow" by the Moroccan writer Suad Al-Nasser, in which the study attempted to trace the various contrasts present in the novel at the level of the title, spaces, events, and values, and to understand their significance and function.

Author Biography

  • Sanae Harboul, Ministry of Education | Morocco

    Ministry of Education | Morocco

References

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Harboul, S. (2025). The sufficiency of contrastive interpretation in the novel "As If It Were a Canopy" by Moroccan Author Suad Al-Nasser, as a model. Journal of Arabic Language Sciences and Literature, 4(3), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.G250525